Notes
Integrity (Latin: integritas) connotes a sense of wholeness, of all parts coming together beautifully and completely. And the lack of integrity? That is nothing but the feeling of coming undone, of being out-of-joint and self-divided.
In “Integrity and Wholeness,” Journal of Applied Philosophy 27.1 (2010), John Cottingham writes that someone who has a “certain psychological wholeness” has “an understanding of the significance of all her various goals and desires, and the true place of each in her overall life-plan — how they fit in with her sense of who she really is.” In the conclusion, he observes, “Integrity is perhaps the hardest virtue to achieve – striving to make sure that all parts of our outlook fit together, that there are no hidden projections or self-deceptions distorting our attitudes.”
Hypothesis: A workable philosophy of life (chapter 2 of my book manuscript) must contain two ingredients:
- Moral and intellectual maturity: Examining one’s life is like growing up.
- Integrity: Living well entails discovering how one’s basic desires and projects hang together. (Shall we call this a beautiful soul?)
Question: Grant that 1. and 2. are necessary conditions–are they sufficient?
Application: Philosophical counseling should focus its attention on 1. and 2.
2 responses to “On integrity”
[…] brings me to the third way of life, that of the “man of integrity.” A person with integrity (integritas) experiences a sense of wholeness throughout the various facets of his life. On good […]
[…] 3. The life of the mind outside of the academy is possible. Such a life must meet 4 demanding criteria: (i) it must be financially stable; (ii) it must be morally virtuous; (iii) it must be meaningful; (iv) it must create a sense of wholeness. […]